Sharpen your legal knowledge with one free MBE practice question every day. Detailed rationales help you understand the why behind each answer.
0 students answered today - 0% got it right
Insofar as the evidence bears on the issue of malingering, there will generally be other evidence having more probative value and involving less likelihood of prejudice than the receipt of a disability pension. Eichel v. New York Central R. Co., 375 U.S. 253, 255, 11 L.Ed.2d 307, 309, 84 S.Ct. 316 (1963).
A pervasive public policy exists for the collateral source rule. The doctrine provides that if an injured party received some compensation for his injuries from a source wholly independent of the tortfeasor, such payment is inadmissible as evidence so that it will not be deducted from the damages which the plaintiff would otherwise collect from the tortfeasor.
See, for example, Hrnjak v. Graymar, Inc., 4 Cal.3d 725, 729-731, 484 P. 2d 599 (CA Supreme Ct 1971).
One MBE-style question each morning with the answer and rationale. Use it as a small daily habit, then come back here for the archive.
Missed a day? Catch up on the last 30 MBE-style questions below.
Science-backed learning strategies to help you pass the bar
Daily practice spreads learning over time, leading to stronger long-term memory retention of legal concepts.
Regular exposure to MBE-style questions reduces test anxiety and builds familiarity with the exam format.
Questions rotate through all seven MBE subjects, ensuring comprehensive coverage over time.
Access 1,900+ MBE questions with detailed explanations
Try BarPrepHero Premium