Inherent Powers

Example

A US naval vessel is attacked in the Pacific Ocean. Without a declaration of war from Congress, the President orders a retaliatory strike. The President argues that they can order this action without a declaration of war because, as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, the President has the inherent power to make individual military decisions without congressional approval. On the other hand, if the President were to declare war, that would fall outside their inherent powers because the Constitution reserves to Congress the authority to declare war.

Case Examples

• The Judicial Branch’s inherent powers: “The ‘inherent powers doctrine’ teaches that federal courts are empowered to deal with diverse matters over which courts have intrinsic authority, such as regulating the practice of law and general judicial housekeeping.” Ellison Steel Inc v. Greystar Constr. LP, No. CV H-04-0629, 2006 WL 8445354, at *3 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 16, 2006). These powers allow the Court to take certain actions on its own (known as sua sponte) as long as said actions protect or enforce the Court’s powers or rulings. Id. In Ellison, the Plaintiff, Ellison Steel Inc., sued the Defendant, Greystar Construction, LP, to recover monies owed for a construction project. Id. The case got moved from the Colorado courts to the Southern District of Texas. Id. The Court used its judicial powers to enjoin the parties from continuing the case in Texas and remanded the case to Colorado. Id. This injunction is designed to promote judicial efficiency and keep cases moving through the judicial process.
• Granting relief: One of the Court’s inherent powers allows the Court to grant any damages that it deems just and proper to make the Plaintiff whole, regardless of whether the Plaintiff requested the relief in its Complaint. See Nankin v. Beverly Ent. Wisconsin, Inc., 774 F. Supp. 540, 542 (E.D. Wis. 1991). Nankin, the Plaintiff, sued Beverly Enterprises, the Defendant, for a dispute over a commercial lease. The lower court granted the Plaintiff damages that the Plaintiff did not request because the Court thought such relief was just and proper. Id. The District Court upheld the lower court’s ruling, stating, “the Court may use its discretion and sense of fairness throughout this proceeding to grant whatever type of relief it deems appropriate.” Id.