Information necessary for the determination of an issue in a lawsuit that is gleaned from the provisions of a document itself, as opposed to testimony from a witness or the terms of other writings that have not been admitted by the court for consideration by the trier of fact.
Consider a scenario where a lawsuit involves the interpretation of a will. The court examines the text of the will itself to determine the intentions of the deceased. The language within the will provides intrinsic evidence, as the meaning and intent are derived directly from the document without external testimony or additional documents.
In the case of Brown v. Estate of Smith, Brown contested the distribution of assets outlined in Smith's will. The court focused on the will's language to resolve ambiguities. The provisions within the will served as intrinsic evidence to determine Smith's intentions regarding the distribution of his estate, without relying on external evidence or witness testimony.
In Johnson v. Green Corp., Johnson sued Green Corp. for breach of contract. The court examined the contract itself to interpret the disputed terms. The contract's provisions provided intrinsic evidence, as the court relied solely on the text within the document to make its determination.
Requirement | Description |
---|---|
Document Provisions | The evidence must come directly from the provisions of the document itself. |
Relevance | The evidence must be relevant to the determination of the issue at hand. |
Independence from External Evidence | The interpretation relies solely on the document's text, without considering external testimony or documents. |
Common issues in cases involving intrinsic evidence often include:
For more detailed information, see our related Evidence terms: